No process is absolutely right or absolutely wrong find the one that best suits you. Other writers prefer to write their conclusion at the end of the paper, after writing the body paragraphs. However, this method may not work for all writers. For this reason, some writers prefer to write their conclusions soon after they have written their introduction. In your conclusion, you recap where they have been. In your introduction, you tell readers where they are headed. Note how Jorge progresses from the opening sentences to background information to his thesis. Read the first draft of his introduction. Jorge decided to begin his research paper by connecting his topic to readers’ daily experiences. Think of your thesis as a signpost that lets readers know in what direction the paper is headed. From there, the writer builds toward a thesis, which is traditionally placed at the end of the introduction. The next few sentences place the opening in context by presenting background information. ![]() A connection between your topic and your readers’ experiences.A brief anecdote that illustrates a larger concept.Many writers like to begin with one of the following catchy openers: The introduction should get readers’ attention, provide background information, and present the writer’s thesis. Key words: Rhetoric, ESL, culture, inaugural speech.There are several approaches to writing an introduction, each of which fulfills the same goals. ![]() It supports Benjamin Whorf’s relativistic assumption in contrastive rhetoric studies that empower second-language writers by acknowledging that their way of writing is specific because of their culturally based writing preferences. The differences and similarities discovered in this study are not unconnected with the distinct cultural and linguistic background of each of the speakers This study creates awareness on the pedagogical variations in Nigerian and American writing systems. Unlike Obasanjo, Obama places emphasis on both coherence of form and meaning. The findings also revealed that Obama’s speech was written in the British or American inductive style while Obasanjo’s speech was written in deductive style. However, both speakers primarily utilize ethos, slightly used pathos, and did not use logos at all. Also Obama intensively used three part lists in his speech while Obasanjo di d not use it at all. ![]() ![]() The speakers differently used metaphors, foregrounding, presentational strategies, preaching strategies, parallelism and indexicals to market their ideologies. Both speakers distinctly presented the ideologies of healthy global relation and acceptance of religious diversity in their respective environments. Obama presented the ideology of responsibility, liberal democracy, strong citizenry and flexible approaches to all issues, while there is the ideology of strong nationality, self glorification and total condemnation of corruption in Obasanjo’s speech. Both speeches were sourced from the Internet and were purposively selected because they were presented in the English language by L1 and L2 users. A textual analysis of the texts is done and contrastive statements made on each of the identified rhetorical strategies and ideologies in both speeches. The work employs the framework of Aristotelian rhetoric that argues that there are three elements to the art of persuasion namely ethos, pathos and logos, and the ethnographic approach that examines language in interaction. This study is carried out to investigate whether and how the linguistic and rhetorical conventions of L1 interfere with writing in L2 in order to acquaint ESL teachers with pedagogical issues second language teaching. Therefore, the study discusses the unique choices of these rhetorical strategies and their linguistic effects, as well as the differences and similarities in rhetorical conventions adopted by the two Presidents in their speeches. The rhetorical strategies adopted by the two presidents and the ideologies inherent in their speeches are not the same despite writing for the same purpose and using the same language. ABSTRACT This study is an exploration of Barak Obama and Olusegun Obasanjo’s first inaugural speeches with an in-depth focus on contrastive rhetorical analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |